<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Be Greedy. There&#8217;s Enough Fault for Everyone.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/</link>
	<description>A Progressive, Skeptical Blog on Israel, Judaism, Culture, Politics, and Literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Missing Matatma: Further thoughts</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-8512</link>
		<dc:creator>The Missing Matatma: Further thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-8512</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t see any reason to exempt the Palestinian side from tough questions.  As I&#8217;ve written before, both parties deserve their far share of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t see any reason to exempt the Palestinian side from tough questions.  As I&#8217;ve written before, both parties deserve their far share of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5351</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5351</guid>
		<description>YBD:
Yes, they pretty certainly mean it.  Their minds may of course change in the future, but for now they mean it.

Now my question for you - and please answer my question as straightforwardly as I have answered yours.  Fatah has consistently (since 1988) said that it supports the right of Israel to exist within the Green Line.  Fatah has consistently (since 1988) said that they want a two-state solution, with a Palestinian state on the West Bank and a Jewish state within the Green line.  These positions are substantially endorsed by the majority of the Palestinian population at large.  Do they mean it or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YBD:<br />
Yes, they pretty certainly mean it.  Their minds may of course change in the future, but for now they mean it.</p>
<p>Now my question for you &#8211; and please answer my question as straightforwardly as I have answered yours.  Fatah has consistently (since 1988) said that it supports the right of Israel to exist within the Green Line.  Fatah has consistently (since 1988) said that they want a two-state solution, with a Palestinian state on the West Bank and a Jewish state within the Green line.  These positions are substantially endorsed by the majority of the Palestinian population at large.  Do they mean it or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y. Ben-David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5347</link>
		<dc:creator>Y. Ben-David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5347</guid>
		<description>David-
HAMAS says they will never recognize Israel or make peace. FATAH says they insist on implementation of the Palestinian Right of Return. Do they mean it or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David-<br />
HAMAS says they will never recognize Israel or make peace. FATAH says they insist on implementation of the Palestinian Right of Return. Do they mean it or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5296</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5296</guid>
		<description>YBD:

You are evading the point.   I don&#039;t know (or frankly care) who these &quot;progressives&quot; are who say that &quot;Arafat&#039;s statements to his own people are not to be taken seriously&quot;.  (My suspicion is that this, like much else in your post, is largely a caricature of your own devising, but my point would stand equally even were that not the case.)  What I am saying is that EVERYTHING the Palestinian leadership says is to be taken seriously, and doubly so the repeatedly expressed opinions of the Palestinians at large. It is you - and, in this thread, ONLY you - who are trying to find reasons to exclude from consideration large portions of the repeatedly and explicitly stated positions of the Palestinian leadership and population.

Remember how this started.  You said (and I quote) &quot;the biggest form of condescension (sp?) is saying “Arabs don’t really mean what they say”&quot;.   There is only one person in this thread engaging in that form of condescension.  You.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YBD:</p>
<p>You are evading the point.   I don&#8217;t know (or frankly care) who these &#8220;progressives&#8221; are who say that &#8220;Arafat&#8217;s statements to his own people are not to be taken seriously&#8221;.  (My suspicion is that this, like much else in your post, is largely a caricature of your own devising, but my point would stand equally even were that not the case.)  What I am saying is that EVERYTHING the Palestinian leadership says is to be taken seriously, and doubly so the repeatedly expressed opinions of the Palestinians at large. It is you &#8211; and, in this thread, ONLY you &#8211; who are trying to find reasons to exclude from consideration large portions of the repeatedly and explicitly stated positions of the Palestinian leadership and population.</p>
<p>Remember how this started.  You said (and I quote) &#8220;the biggest form of condescension (sp?) is saying “Arabs don’t really mean what they say”&#8221;.   There is only one person in this thread engaging in that form of condescension.  You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y. Ben-David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5292</link>
		<dc:creator>Y. Ben-David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5292</guid>
		<description>Oops, I meant, at the beginning that &quot;what I hear from &#039;progressives&#039; all the time is the hostile statements by ARABS about Israel....etc&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, I meant, at the beginning that &#8220;what I hear from &#8216;progressives&#8217; all the time is the hostile statements by ARABS about Israel&#8230;.etc&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y. Ben-David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>Y. Ben-David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>David-
What I hear from &quot;progressives&quot; are warlike, hostile statements about Israel and their refusal to ever make real peace with it, made to their own populations, in Arabic are NOT their true position, their &quot;real&quot; views are expressed in English to Western reporters and diplomats. This is ridiculous. They live with their OWN people. For many years, &quot;progressives&quot; said &quot;these hostile statements made about Israeli are merely meant for internal consumption&quot;.  In other words, the assumption is just as Israeli leaders lie to their own people, so do Arabs. BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE. Arafat was very consistent over the years in what he told his people...he told them over and over that they were in a war to the death with Zionism and Israel, but he would make tactical agreements statements towards Israelis and other Westerners in order to weaken their resolve, just like Muhammed did with the Quraish in Mecca. Arafat was very clean in his internal propaganda to the Palestinians, after he was brought in by Rabin and Peres that they were waiting for the right time to strike.  Faisal Hussein called it &quot;the Trojan Horse&quot; scheme. In 2000 Arafat felt the time was right and he launched the suicide bomber war, as he had always promised. He kept his word to his people and he &quot;broke his word&quot; to Israel. Big surprise.  Only the very naive could have ever believed him. Same with Abbas, although he is weaker.

Over and over, &quot;progressives&quot; keep projecting their own values on the Palestinians...they claim to know what is &quot;best&quot; for them...they say &quot;if I were a Palestinian,  I would make peace with Israel&quot;. This is arrogance of the highest order. It is time to look at the Palestinians and the rest of the Arab/Muslim world. If they truly want peace, we will meet them more than half way, but we will not fall prey to their tricks, as tragically so many Israeli governments have in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David-<br />
What I hear from &#8220;progressives&#8221; are warlike, hostile statements about Israel and their refusal to ever make real peace with it, made to their own populations, in Arabic are NOT their true position, their &#8220;real&#8221; views are expressed in English to Western reporters and diplomats. This is ridiculous. They live with their OWN people. For many years, &#8220;progressives&#8221; said &#8220;these hostile statements made about Israeli are merely meant for internal consumption&#8221;.  In other words, the assumption is just as Israeli leaders lie to their own people, so do Arabs. BUT THIS IS NOT TRUE. Arafat was very consistent over the years in what he told his people&#8230;he told them over and over that they were in a war to the death with Zionism and Israel, but he would make tactical agreements statements towards Israelis and other Westerners in order to weaken their resolve, just like Muhammed did with the Quraish in Mecca. Arafat was very clean in his internal propaganda to the Palestinians, after he was brought in by Rabin and Peres that they were waiting for the right time to strike.  Faisal Hussein called it &#8220;the Trojan Horse&#8221; scheme. In 2000 Arafat felt the time was right and he launched the suicide bomber war, as he had always promised. He kept his word to his people and he &#8220;broke his word&#8221; to Israel. Big surprise.  Only the very naive could have ever believed him. Same with Abbas, although he is weaker.</p>
<p>Over and over, &#8220;progressives&#8221; keep projecting their own values on the Palestinians&#8230;they claim to know what is &#8220;best&#8221; for them&#8230;they say &#8220;if I were a Palestinian,  I would make peace with Israel&#8221;. This is arrogance of the highest order. It is time to look at the Palestinians and the rest of the Arab/Muslim world. If they truly want peace, we will meet them more than half way, but we will not fall prey to their tricks, as tragically so many Israeli governments have in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5287</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5287</guid>
		<description>YBD:

I think you&#039;ve made my point.  Nothing I&#039;ve ever read from the &quot;Left&quot; condescends to Palestinians one tenth as much as you have here or fails to take their repeated and explicit statements seriously one tenth as much as you have here.  It&#039;s pretty clear that you only take Palestinian statements at face value when they support a thesis of Palestinian hostility; for the rest you feel entitled to reject everything they say.   As I said, the problem of condescension to the Palestinians comes from the &quot;Right&quot;, not the &quot;Left&quot;, as you amply demonstrate here.

I agree with you that there is an inconsistency between the Palestinian desire for a two-state solution and their support for the &quot;Right of Return&quot;.  This does not show that they do not really support a two-state solution; it shows that people are sometimes inconsistent.  There is a similar inconsistency on the Israeli side found in anyone who (a) wants Israel to be a Jewish state, (b) wants Israel to be a democratic state, and (c) refuses to give up the bulk of the West Bank.  Such people&#039;s views are laughably inconsistent (far more blatantly so, indeed, than the Palestinian inconsistency on the &quot;right of return&quot;); but it does not demonstrate that any of (a), (b), or (c) are not sincerely held.  It does however mean that any solution to the problem will have to involve both sides being forced to confront the real implications of their positions and to make some hard choices between them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YBD:</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve made my point.  Nothing I&#8217;ve ever read from the &#8220;Left&#8221; condescends to Palestinians one tenth as much as you have here or fails to take their repeated and explicit statements seriously one tenth as much as you have here.  It&#8217;s pretty clear that you only take Palestinian statements at face value when they support a thesis of Palestinian hostility; for the rest you feel entitled to reject everything they say.   As I said, the problem of condescension to the Palestinians comes from the &#8220;Right&#8221;, not the &#8220;Left&#8221;, as you amply demonstrate here.</p>
<p>I agree with you that there is an inconsistency between the Palestinian desire for a two-state solution and their support for the &#8220;Right of Return&#8221;.  This does not show that they do not really support a two-state solution; it shows that people are sometimes inconsistent.  There is a similar inconsistency on the Israeli side found in anyone who (a) wants Israel to be a Jewish state, (b) wants Israel to be a democratic state, and (c) refuses to give up the bulk of the West Bank.  Such people&#8217;s views are laughably inconsistent (far more blatantly so, indeed, than the Palestinian inconsistency on the &#8220;right of return&#8221;); but it does not demonstrate that any of (a), (b), or (c) are not sincerely held.  It does however mean that any solution to the problem will have to involve both sides being forced to confront the real implications of their positions and to make some hard choices between them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y. Ben-David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5274</link>
		<dc:creator>Y. Ben-David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 05:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5274</guid>
		<description>David-First HAMAS says they don&#039;t accept it. They won the last Palestinian elections on that platform. Secondly, I don&#039;t put much faith in Palestinian opinion polls, just like I don&#039;t put much faith in Israeli opinion polls that are publicized in the media (as opposed to Steinmetz Peace Center polls which are more scientific and fair).  Palestinian polls always show a &quot;majority&quot; for whatever the Palestinian Authority&#039;s official position is. During the height of the terror war several years ago, majorities supported the terror and opposition to peace with Israel. Now, the official line has changed and so has the &quot;majority&quot; in the polls.  Who pays for these polls? Where are they publicized?
In any event , even when they say they support a &quot;2-state solution&quot;, they also show gigantic majorities for full implementation of the Palestinian &quot;right of return&quot; which pretty much renders any realistic peace agreement impossible. 
The Palestinian Authority, even when saying the &quot;recognize&quot; Israel or conduct negotiations with them, makes it VERY clear to their people that they have no intention of living in peace with Israel, they never talk about peace, they keep their population mobilized for endless struggle.  Peace is more than just having the leader of the Palestinians making statements in English to Western diplomats and journalists claiming they also want &quot;peace&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David-First HAMAS says they don&#8217;t accept it. They won the last Palestinian elections on that platform. Secondly, I don&#8217;t put much faith in Palestinian opinion polls, just like I don&#8217;t put much faith in Israeli opinion polls that are publicized in the media (as opposed to Steinmetz Peace Center polls which are more scientific and fair).  Palestinian polls always show a &#8220;majority&#8221; for whatever the Palestinian Authority&#8217;s official position is. During the height of the terror war several years ago, majorities supported the terror and opposition to peace with Israel. Now, the official line has changed and so has the &#8220;majority&#8221; in the polls.  Who pays for these polls? Where are they publicized?<br />
In any event , even when they say they support a &#8220;2-state solution&#8221;, they also show gigantic majorities for full implementation of the Palestinian &#8220;right of return&#8221; which pretty much renders any realistic peace agreement impossible.<br />
The Palestinian Authority, even when saying the &#8220;recognize&#8221; Israel or conduct negotiations with them, makes it VERY clear to their people that they have no intention of living in peace with Israel, they never talk about peace, they keep their population mobilized for endless struggle.  Peace is more than just having the leader of the Palestinians making statements in English to Western diplomats and journalists claiming they also want &#8220;peace&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5253</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5253</guid>
		<description>YBD:

I agree with you that anyone who argues that &quot;Palestinians don&#039;t really mean what they say&quot; about (e.g) the &quot;Right of Return&quot; is being condescending  - though it is not condescending to suggest that they really mean it, but might be persuaded to surrender or dilute it in the course of negotiations.  (That view might well of course be deluded, but that&#039;s another matter.)

But it is not only - or indeed primarily - the &quot;Left&quot; who condescend to Palestinians by refusing to believe that they mean what they say.  Palestinians at large consistently say that they support a two-state solution (as measured in opinion polls such as this one: http://www.geneva-accord.org/mainmenu/-june-2008-poll-vast-majority-of-palestinians-favor-two-state-solution-over-one-state-solution); this has been the official policy of Fatah since the Algiers Declaration of 1988, and has frequently been reaffirmed by the Fatah leadership.  How often have you heard people say that these statements are not to be taken seriously, and that we should not believe that Palestinians mean what they say on this subject?  Do you think that the people who refuse to take such Palestinian statements at face value are mainly on the &quot;Right&quot; or the &quot;Left&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YBD:</p>
<p>I agree with you that anyone who argues that &#8220;Palestinians don&#8217;t really mean what they say&#8221; about (e.g) the &#8220;Right of Return&#8221; is being condescending  &#8211; though it is not condescending to suggest that they really mean it, but might be persuaded to surrender or dilute it in the course of negotiations.  (That view might well of course be deluded, but that&#8217;s another matter.)</p>
<p>But it is not only &#8211; or indeed primarily &#8211; the &#8220;Left&#8221; who condescend to Palestinians by refusing to believe that they mean what they say.  Palestinians at large consistently say that they support a two-state solution (as measured in opinion polls such as this one: <a href="http://www.geneva-accord.org/mainmenu/-june-2008-poll-vast-majority-of-palestinians-favor-two-state-solution-over-one-state-solution" rel="nofollow">http://www.geneva-accord.org/mainmenu/-june-2008-poll-vast-majority-of-palestinians-favor-two-state-solution-over-one-state-solution</a>); this has been the official policy of Fatah since the Algiers Declaration of 1988, and has frequently been reaffirmed by the Fatah leadership.  How often have you heard people say that these statements are not to be taken seriously, and that we should not believe that Palestinians mean what they say on this subject?  Do you think that the people who refuse to take such Palestinian statements at face value are mainly on the &#8220;Right&#8221; or the &#8220;Left&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y. Ben-David</title>
		<link>http://southjerusalem.com/2008/12/dont-be-greedy-theres-enough-fault-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>Y. Ben-David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 07:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southjerusalem.com/?p=580#comment-5245</guid>
		<description>Aliyah06-
Couldn&#039;t agree with you more!  Israeli Leftists regard Arabs as being like retarded children, they must be indulged no matter what they do because &quot;you can&#039;t expect them to be better&quot;. The biggest form of condescension (sp?) is saying &quot;Arabs don&#039;t really mean what they say&quot;...e.g. Arafat and others insistence on the Palestinian &quot;Right of Return&quot; (&#039;&quot;they don&#039;t really mean it, they are using it merely as a bargaining chip&quot;), or HAMAS saying explicitly they will never  make peace with Israel (&quot;once they have power they will be forced to become more pragmatic&quot;-just like they said about Hitler). Another good one is encapsulated in Shimon Peres&#039; statement &quot;land is not important, the spirit is what is important&quot;.  A professor who repeated this in the Makor Rishon newspaper was then asked &quot;then wouldn&#039;t we be doing the Palestinians a favor by NOT giving them a state...we will be showing them that they are better off by living by the sprit&quot;?. The professor&#039;s answer was essentially &quot;you don&#039;t understand, the Palestinians are primitive, they are supposed to be nationalists, we Jews are superior, we should be anti-nationalist&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aliyah06-<br />
Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more!  Israeli Leftists regard Arabs as being like retarded children, they must be indulged no matter what they do because &#8220;you can&#8217;t expect them to be better&#8221;. The biggest form of condescension (sp?) is saying &#8220;Arabs don&#8217;t really mean what they say&#8221;&#8230;e.g. Arafat and others insistence on the Palestinian &#8220;Right of Return&#8221; (&#8216;&#8221;they don&#8217;t really mean it, they are using it merely as a bargaining chip&#8221;), or HAMAS saying explicitly they will never  make peace with Israel (&#8220;once they have power they will be forced to become more pragmatic&#8221;-just like they said about Hitler). Another good one is encapsulated in Shimon Peres&#8217; statement &#8220;land is not important, the spirit is what is important&#8221;.  A professor who repeated this in the Makor Rishon newspaper was then asked &#8220;then wouldn&#8217;t we be doing the Palestinians a favor by NOT giving them a state&#8230;we will be showing them that they are better off by living by the sprit&#8221;?. The professor&#8217;s answer was essentially &#8220;you don&#8217;t understand, the Palestinians are primitive, they are supposed to be nationalists, we Jews are superior, we should be anti-nationalist&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

